ISPN Forum Index ISPN
Discussion Forum of the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Issue on specifier

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ISPN Forum Index -> PhyloCode
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
leowsham



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Tue 19 Sep, 2006 12:11 pm    Post subject: Issue on specifier Reply with quote

11.1. Specifiers are species, specimens or apomorphies cited in a phylogenetic definition of a name as reference points that serve to specify the clade to which the name applies.

For the sake of discussion - should genus be allowed to be used as specifiers in paleontology? One skull does not a species made, it's said, and many-a-times fossils do not resolve well on the species level. Would it be more pragmatic to anchor on a genous plus a well preserved and studied specimen (with authorship and date of publ.)? Please explain and give your rationale, thanks!
_________________
vivat scientia !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
David Marjanović



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 137
Location: currently Paris

PostPosted: Tue 19 Sep, 2006 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read the rest of Article 11, and you will find that you can directly use specimens as specifiers. You can kiss the "species problem" goodbye. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmkeesey
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 287
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA

PostPosted: Tue 19 Sep, 2006 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ichthyornithes sensu Clarke 2004 is an example of a clade that uses a specimen as a specifier (as well as three extant species as external specifiers).

Quote:
. . . the clade stemming from an ancestor that possessed all of the morphologies described by apomorphies 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 (in the Ichthyornis dispar Diagnosis) homologous (sensu Patterson, 1982) with those in YPM 1450 (holotype of Ichthyornis dispar Marsh, 1872b) and more closely related to YPM 1450 than to Aves (internal specifiers of Gauthier and de Queiroz, 2001) (Clarke, 2004:20).

_________________
T. Michael Keesey
Director of Technology, Exopolis, Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tmkeesey
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 287
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just noticed an error in my post. That's Clarke's definition of Ichthyornis, not Ichthyornithes.
_________________
T. Michael Keesey
Director of Technology, Exopolis, Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ISPN Forum Index -> PhyloCode All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group